Implementing Smart Cities in Africa: a project framework

African cities are among the youngest and fastest growing in the world. While numbers vary, Lagos alone is said to welcome 4000 new persons every day, who are looking for better living conditions in the metropolis. Like everywhere else, this demographic increase puts enormous pressure on the infrastructure, housing and job opportunities available, not to mention on the public services and the development of the informal market. At the same time, this presents an opportunity to do things differently, to tap into Africa’s innovation and creativity, and link it with potential technology offerings, by bringing people together to discuss solutions and ways forward. This was the approach ASToN (African Smart Towns Network) programme took between 2019 and 2022. The stimulus (the framework) provided, assembled the cities on an experimental learning journey. These are some of the lessons learned on this journey together.

PROVIDING CITIES A FRAMEWORK TO DRIVE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION THAT UNLOCKS MOMENTUM AND RESOURCES FOR THEIR TEAMS

While digital transformation was at the core of ASToN, as the programme got started, it quickly became evident that some challenges were cross-cutting, to varying degrees, among the cities, in the follow respects. Building digital capacities inside a municipality takes time, especially where faced with limited human resources. Also, all of the cities were confronted with the make-or-buy dilemma, besides the initial big investment that most digital projects require. Additionally, introducing digital and tech in city administrations often clashed with traditional ways of working, especially where tasks were manual, and it implied potentially losing jobs for some city employees.

The digital maturity of both institutions and the territory was variable across the network, with some cities like Niamey (Niger) or Bizerte (Tunisia) kick-starting their first digital projects vs others like Kigali or Kampala, where smart city frameworks and strategies were already in place. Despite this variety, in working with peers, both locally and internationally, it soon became clear that this gave cities the necessary momentum to drive the process, establish powerful relationships, and find the necessary skills and resources to get to work.

Agnes Khawa from Kampala Capital City Authority, Uganda and member of ASToN shared her experience: “... Kampala has been able to come up with a digital mobility solution, also known as KlaConnect. With this ..., citizens will be able to improve their mobility experience through viewing real time traffic information, incidents, road closures and diversions and receive feedback from the city authority. We have also been able to bring together various stakeholders in a local action group, comprising members from the public sector, private sector, politicians and also citizens.”

By working with both an international group of peers and a local stakeholder group, cities like Kampala were able to escape the make-or-buy dilemma. The local authority in collaboration with private partners who were part of the local group, designed a solution that they owned fully. Furthermore, working with other stakeholders ensures that the municipality follows through with the project and stays committed throughout the process. This is done through a mix of political will, team engagement and continuing relations with the other members of the network. Importantly, in the case of cities like Niamey (Niger) or Bamako (Mali), where decentralisation is ongoing, being part of a peer group of cities empowers municipalities to work with national bodies and build lasting partnerships with them.

TESTING SMALL AND FAILING FAST: EXPERIMENTATION AS A TOOL FOR CITIES

The Experimentation phase of the Kampala project was designed to allow local authorities to learn non-linear ways of working, as with the Agile method, and to use it to test parts of their local action plan. The City’s teams made assumptions about their project, which they then sought to validate or invalidate through experimentation, so that they could incorporate these learnings into their action plans. The ASToN approach was to support local authorities in embracing uncertainty and designing projects that would allow them to act on evidence, adapt or pivot, and place learning (about their solutions, their users and other stakeholders) at the heart of their project. The Experimentation phase was not mandatory, and cities only accessed it if they wanted to and were ready for it.

When it joined ASToN, the city Sèmè-Podji, in Benin, aimed to develop a solution for the digitalisation of its land register. The local team was concerned with the rising number of conflicts and trials linked to land ownership, due to the manual land management system of the city. Farid Salako, Municipal Councillor recounted, “Our solution was tested in one neighbourhood of the city, on a 50ha area. Very quickly, the local team organised encounters and exchanges in the neighbourhood, with the citizens and the “wise man” of the community to explain the project to them. We also used the local radio and public criers. We are proud to say this worked and we were able to collect 80% of the data from the neighbourhood”. Farid added that this process worked so well that the citizens started organising themselves to provide the data. As a local authority, he said, this approach was a way to learn about the importance of testing something small before scaling up and of communicating well with the citizens. One of the reasons why this worked so well in the case of Sèmè-Podji was because the Municipality was clear about the “why” or vision of the project. This allowed them, on the one hand, to communicate about it efficiently to the citizens, and on the other, to deal with the uncertainty of the “how”. When the normal data collection process did not initially work, they were able to add a communication layer to their experimentation, using the tools most relevant for the locals, in order to achieve their results.

Focusing on the principles of experimentation, rather than on the methods, allowed cities to test their ideas in their own way. For ASToN, the lesson was that working through cycles of test-learn-iterate was often not just an unfamiliar and uncomfortable premise for public officials, but also went against the grain of both the mechanisms and regulations of municipal authorities. For example, when the Municipality of Bizerte was looking to source a partner to develop a minimum-viable-product (MVP) for their solution, they found that existing procurement processes required them to provide a detailed, long-term, fixed scope of work, which left limited space to iterate the product based on learnings. In short, a fixed experimentation method would have been ill-adapted or irrelevant for local authorities, and would not have supported them in actually testing their assumptions.